A Storytelling Autopsy: Friday The 13th Part 8 - Jason Takes Manhattan
What follows is not a review, or even a
proper critical evaluation of FRIDAY THE 13th PART VIII:JASON TAKES MANHATTAN. Instead, I'll try to peel back the
storytelling mechanics to explain why this Metrocard-swiping entry in
the franchise still haunts us.
(warning: spoilers (and toxic waste cannisters) follow, in the improbable case you haven't seen the film.)
(warning: spoilers (and toxic waste cannisters) follow, in the improbable case you haven't seen the film.)
Viewed from a distance of twenty-three
years, JASON TAKES MANHATTAN is best viewed as an excavated time
capsule from a long-lost civilization. The late '80s culture on
display- haircuts and fashions, slang and John Hughesque teen angst-
is so central to the movie that the entire affair often seems like a
prolonged bumper-ad for a block of pre-reality show MTV programming.
Even the title city is an alien landscape to today's New Yorker.
Vancouver back alleys aside, the scenes of filthy streets,
graffiti-lined subway cars, and rough neighborhoods is strongly at
odds with today's post-Giuliani gotham.
The decision to remove Jason from
Crystal Lake must have seemed like a genuinely exciting way for the
producers to offer something different to the shrinking core
audience. Unfortunately, the problems with placing the series'
central character in a new environment, especially the one they
chose, undermines not just the established plot elements of the
previous installments (Crystal Lake connects to the ocean?) but the
internal logic of the entire concept. The story of Jason is rooted
in campfire stories, the rural incarnation of “urban” legends.
Rural folklore works on a symbolic level, espousing traditional
morality tales in the grimmest way possible, but fail to pass basic
tests of logic. The “Man with the Hook”, probably the most
famous American verbal folktale, operates on the assumption that the
listener not probe the story for inconsistencies but react to it on a
more basic, primordial level. On its own, the events in “Hook”
would barely raise a goose-bump in the world of hard news- a field
now exemplified by terrorist attacks, school shootings, and movie
theater massacres (the real kind). The listener choses to suspend
disbelief in a very specific way, turning off the critical part of
his mind in order to facilitate the effect of the story. One thing a
good campfire storyteller should never do is try to provide proof of
the events he describes. No wonder that these things usually begin
something like, “This happened to a friend of my brother. His
roommate told him that...”
Or, for that matter, “If you listen
to the old timers in town, they'll tell ya...”
How then can JASON TAKES MANHATTAN hope
to achieve any sort of reaction- other than derision- from a plot
that drops the maniac in a city where, in 1989, there were 2,246
murders; 5,242 rapes; 91,571 assaults. [These are real numbers: see
www.disastercenter.com].
Jason's rampage, frankly, wouldn't even prove the deadliest day of
the year. Crystal Lake is a fantasy setting, an idyllic summer camp
in rural New Jersey, a place where college aged kids enjoy one last
summer of playful hijacks before surrendering themselves to lives
punching time cards. Ironically, violent fantasy works best set
against innocuous backdrops. The film itself all but acknowledges
this, blissfully ignorant that portraying the city as a sprawling
necropolis of drug gangs and knife-wielding punks circumvents any
chance of building dramatic tension.
When Rennie, this chapter's super-bland
final girl, is drugged and nearly raped by a couple of apparently
homeless heroine addicts, it becomes difficult not to see Jason
transformed into a hero of sorts. Jason just intends to behead the
brunette- God only knows what those two scumbags had planned.
Unfortunately, the dramatic structure of the film demands that we
root for the whitebread Final Couple to survive, which is daunting
considering that Kane Hodder's Jason has far more character on
display- and is ultimately far more likable.
Since there's no chance that this
chapter will evoke any sort of fright, there's a half-hearted attempt
to make each of the deaths ironic. A drug addict is killed with his
syringe. The self-absorbed beauty is stabbed with shards of a
mirror. A boxer is decapitated by a punch. A schoolteacher who
forced his daughter to sink-or-swim in Crystal Lake is drowned in a
barrel on dry land. It must have looked clever on paper. The
effect, however, is counter-productive: the plot bends over backward
to allow for each set-piece murder, often at the expense of pace and
logic. The problem isn't that Jason seems to be everywhere, no, the
problem is that he's always exactly where he needs to be to enable
the screenplay to off characters in “clever” ways. It's tiring.
Along the way, certainly in response to
the NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET series, which was at that moment at its
peak, nonsensical hallucination sequences worm their way into the
narrative. They never add anything to the proceedings, not even the
intended cheap scares, because each is staged with obnoxious neon
colors and overwrought orchestra hits. Curiously, the only time
Rennie doesn't hallucinate is when she's high on black tar
heroin. For the sake of the viewer, she should have remained
medicated, if only to avoid each new nightmare sequence, the most
notable aspect of which is Jason's progressive childhood baldness.
The film really goes off the rails,
though, at its climax. Without warning, a sewer worker who bears an
uncomfortably strong resemblance to John Carpenter, notes that the
city's entire sewer system floods with toxic waste each night. Where
the toxic waste goes during the daytime is anyone's guess. This
audacious plot deviation isn't merely a head-scratching, eye-rolling,
enigma-wrapped riddle, it's a raised middle finger to the core
audience. Who expects his audience to accept this? And what must he
think of that audience?
Anyway, the sewers flood with enough
toxic waste to further mutate the Ninja Turtles into C.H.U.D.s and
Jason drowns, and dissolves, in the firewater. It's unclear whether
Renny's vision of a “pure” child version of Jason is meant
literally or as hallucination. Has the toxic waste burned away
Jason's evil? Is Rennie's fears of the young Jason from her
childhood finally put to rest by the vision of him truly drowned?
It doesn't really matter, since neither choice makes any sense, and
the viewers at that point don't care.
It's understandable that JASON TAKES
MANHATTAN failed to generate enough excitement, or box office cash,
for Paramount to continue the series. This film, like the fifth, is
an insult to the fans. Jason, it seemed, was down for the count. To
paraphrase the end of KING KONG, a terrific film about a monster in
New York, “T'wasn't the toxic waste that killed 'em, bad writing
killed the beast.”
But the thing about rural folklore...
stories of spider eggs in beehive hairdos, of babysitters and
telephones, of escaped lunatics with hooks for hands... the thing
about these stories is that they never stay untold for long. There's
always a new twist waiting to be told...
Jason Voorhees, you ask? My cousin's
roommate from college told me about him. Don't believe me? Well, you
can go to hell.